Inventio
creative thinking about learning and teaching
February 1999 Vol 1, No 1In this IssueAbout InventioEditorial Board
Is George Mason a Learning-Centered University?
David L. Potter
 

© Copyright 1998-99 by David L. Potter (dpotter@gmu.eduThe right to make additional exact copies, including this notice, for personal and classroom use, is hereby granted. All other forms of distribution and copying require permission of the author.

 

"Is George Mason a learning-centered university?"

If we forego the urge to answer immediately "Of course!" and instead ask what might be entailed in being a learning-centered institution, we may engage in useful self-reflection. We may in that process reaffirm our institutional commitment to our central purpose--our learning mission, our essential functions--teaching, learning, scholarship and service, and our identity--how we see ourselves and how we might advantageously represent ourselves to others.

The question, and the consequent answers, may also be viewed as a response to several issues. We often are accused by outsiders of being "faculty-centered." In its extreme form, this criticism portrays us as operating the university for our convenience, inattentive to teaching--particularly undergraduates, and graduating poorly educated students. More recently, we hear advocacy for a purported antidote to this self-centeredness, a call for more "student-centered" institutions.

Carried to its extreme, this becomes a form of consumerism.  If we endorse a learning-centered approach to these issues, we establish a goal that transcends the interests of any constituency and a focus that defines our respective and shared responsibilities.

Next Section: The Real Problem: Students?